mozilla

Mozilla Nederland LogoDe Nederlandse
Mozilla-gemeenschap

Mozilla B-Team: happy bmo push day!

Mozilla planet - vr, 22/02/2019 - 19:38

Among bugfixes and enhancements, code blocks are now syntax highlighted using @prismjs.

release tag

the following changes have been pushed to bugzilla.mozilla.org:

  • [1523317] Exclude Graveyard products from QuickSearch results
  • [1512815] Optimize Bugzilla->active_custom_fields() for CPU and memory usage
  • [1524213] phabricator revisions list on bug page has extra / in the revision link
  • [1523404] Cannot clear all scopes when editing an oauth2 client. Throws DB error
  • [1525308] Custom Bug…

View On WordPress

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Niko Matsakis: Rust lang team working groups

Mozilla planet - vr, 22/02/2019 - 06:00

Now that the Rust 2018 edition has shipped, the language design team has been thinking a lot about what to do in 2019 and over the next few years. I think we’ve got a lot of exciting stuff on the horizon, and I wanted to write about it.

Theme for this edition

In 2015, our overall theme was stability. For the 2018 Edition, we adopted productivity. For Rust 20211, we are thinking of maturity as the theme. Our goal is finish up a number of in-flight features – such as specialization, generic associated types, and const generics – that have emerged as key enablers for future work. In tandem, we aim to start improving our reference material, both through continuing the great work that’s been done on the Rust reference but also through more specialized efforts like the Grammar and Unsafe Code Guidelines working groups.

Working groups

Actually, the thing I’m most excited about has nothing to do with the language at all, but rather a change to how we operate. We are planning to start focusing our operations on a series of lang team working groups. Each working group is focusing on a specific goal. This can be as narrow as a single RFC, or it might be a family of related RFCs (“async code”, “FFI”).

The plan is to repurpose our weekly meeting. Each week we will do some amount of triage, but also check in with one working group. In the days leading up to the meeting, the WG will post a written report describing the agenda: this report should review what happened since the last chat, discuss thorny questions, help assess priorities, and plan the upcoming roadmap. These meetings will be recorded and open to anyone who wants to attend. Our hope in particular is that active working group participants will join the meeting.

Finally, as part of this move, we are creating a lang team repository which will serve as the “home” for the lang team. It’ll describe our process, list the active working groups, and also show the ideas that are on the “shortlist” – basically, things we expect to start doing once we wrap some of our ongoing work. The repository will also have advice for how to get involved.

Initial set of active working groups

We’ve also outlined what we expect to be our initial set of active working groups. This isn’t a final list: we might add a thing or two, or take something away. The list more or less maps to the “high priority” endeavors that are already in progress.

For each working group, we also have a rough idea for who the “leads” will be. The leads of a working group are those helping to keep it organized and functonal. Note that some leads are not members of the lang team. In fact, helping to co-lead a working group is a great way to get involved with language design, and also a good stepping stone to full team membership if desired.

  • Traits working group:
    • Focused on working out remaining design details of specialization, GATs, impl Trait, and other trait-focused features.
    • Working closely with the compiler traits working group on implementation.
    • Likely leads: aturon, nmatsakis, centril
  • Grammar working group:
    • Focused on developing a canonical grammar, following roughly the process laid out in RFC 1331.
    • Likely leads: qmx, centril, eddyb
  • Async: Foundations
    • Focused on core language features like async-await or the Futures trait that enable async I/O.
      • Distinct from the “Async: Ecosystem” domain working group, which will focus on bolstering the ecosystem for async code through new crates and documentation.
    • Likely leads: cramertj, boats
  • Unsafe code guidelines
    • Focused on developing rules for unsafe code: what is allowed, what is not.
    • Likely leads: avacadavara, nikomatsakis, pnkfelix
  • Foreign function interface
    • Focused on ensuring that Rust and C programs can seamlessly and ergonomically interact. The goal is to permit Rust code to call or be called by any C function and handle any C data structure, as well as all common systems code scenarios and supporting inline assembly.
    • Likely leads: joshtriplett
Bootstrapping the working groups

Over the next few weeks, we expect to be “bootstrapping” these working groups. (In some cases, like grammar and the unsafe code guidelines, these groups are already quite active, but in others they are not or have not been formally organized.) For each group, we’ll be putting out a call to get involved, and trying to draw up an initial roadmap laying out where we are now and what the next few steps we’ll be. If something on that list looks like something you’d like to help with, stay tuned!

Looking to 2019 and beyond

The set of roadmaps listed there aren’t meant to be an exhaustive list of the things we plan to do. Rather, they are meant to be a starting point: these are largely the activites we are currently doing, and we plan to focus on those and see them to completion (though the FFI working group is something of a new focus).

The idea is that, as those working groups wind down and bandwidth becomes available, we will turn out focus to new things. To that end, we aim to draw up a shortlist and post it on the website, so that you have some idea the range of things we are considering for the future. Note that the mere presence of an idea on the shortlist is not a guarantee that it will come to pass: it may be that in working through the proposed idea, we decide we don’t want it, and so forth.

Conclusion

2019 is going to be a big year for the lang team – not only because of the work we plan to do, but because of the way we plan to do it. I’m really looking forward to it, and I hope to see you all soon at a WG meeting!

  1. Assuming we do a Rust 2021 edition, which I expect we will.

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

The Rust Programming Language Blog: Changes in the core team

Mozilla planet - vr, 22/02/2019 - 01:00

Just a quick update: You may have noticed that, in the last month or so, a number of Rust core team members have changed their jobs and/or their roles in the project. Two people have decided to step back from the core team:

With Rust 2018 having shipped, this is a natural time of transition. While we’ll miss Nick and Aaron’s contributions to the core team, we are very excited for them to be focusing on something new, and we’re very happy that they are still going to stay involved with Rust. We’re also looking into growing the core team to help with the work ahead.

Finally, two other members have changed their jobs, but plan to stay involved in the core team:

That’s it!

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Alex Gibson: Testing native ES modules using Mocha and esm

Mozilla planet - vr, 22/02/2019 - 01:00

I recently worked on a project where I wanted to switch to using native ES modules in the browser. Migrating the existing code to use ES modules was easy enough, but the tricky part came when I wanted to maintain the existing unit tests. It turns out that many JavaScript testing frameworks don’t yet support native ES modules, and I was struggling to find an easy solution that didn’t require transpiling my code back to ES5.

I managed to hack together Mocha’s browser test runner to work with ES modules, but I couldn’t find a simple way to automate this in CI. The project I was working on also had a suite of Node based unit tests, which were written using Jest. Node doesn’t yet support native ES modules either, and I wanted to try and avoid using two different testing frameworks if at all possible. I was stuck.

The solution came when I heard about a rather clever library called esm. It’s is a fast, production ready, zero-dependency ES module loader for Node. Using it with Mocha turned out to be really straight forward. Here’s a basic example demonstrating how to do it.

First, make sure you have both Mocha and esm installed. Next, create an ES module. Here’s a very trivial example called sum.js:

export default function sum(a, b) { return a + b; }

A unit test for this module could look like the following piece of code (let’s call it sum.test.js). Note that here I’m using Chai, but you could use any assertion library that Mocha supports.

import sum from './sum.js'; import { expect } from 'chai'; describe('sum', function() { it('should return the sum of two arguments', function () { expect(sum(1, 2)).to.equal(3); }); });

If we try to run this test on the command line using mocha 'sum.test.js' then we get an error. This is because Node does not yet understand the ES import syntax.

import sum from './sum.js'; ^^^ SyntaxError: Unexpected identifier

Thankfully, fixing this using esm is really easy. All that’s needed is to pass in esm as a require to our mocha command:

mocha 'sum.test.js' --require esm

The test now passes without any further configuration changes. Success!

sum ✓ should return the sum of two arguments 1 passing (10ms)

Because Mocha is Node based, I was also able to port the project’s back-end tests to use the same framework. Being able to run both suite of tests via an npm script in package.json is nice and simple:

"scripts": { "test": "npm run test-node && npm run test-browser", "test-browser": "mocha --recursive './test/browser/**/*.js' --require esm", "test-node": "mocha --recursive './test/node/**/*.js'", },
Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Mozilla Localization (L10N): L10n report: February edition

Mozilla planet - do, 21/02/2019 - 19:40
Welcome!

New localizers

The following contributors came to us through the Common Voice project.

  • Paramashivam of Tamil, also very active on the Firefox project
  • Roi of Hebrew on a variety of projects
  • Théo of Kinyarwanda has made a lot of progress in a short period of time!
  • Danielius of Lithuanian joins us last week
  • Nienke of Frisian leading a group of colleagues focuses their effort on sentence collection at the moment

Are you a locale leader and want us to include new members in our upcoming reports? Contact us!

New community/locales added New content and projects What’s new or coming up in Firefox desktop

This week we’re going to reach an important milestone for Fluent in Firefox, having more Fluent strings than DTDs in mozilla-central (currently 2466 vs 2489). There are already 5 patches in review to migrate more elements to Fluent, thanks to the work of the MSU Capstone students: Page Info window, contextual menu for tabs, print dialogs, about:privatebrowsing, Password Manager dialog.

Here are a few important dates for the current release cycles:

  • Firefox 67 is in Nightly, and will move to Beta on March 18.
  • Firefox 66 is in Beta. The deadline for localization is March 5.
  • Firefox 66 will be released on March 19.

In terms of content, the priority currently remains on the profile-per-install feature already mentioned in the previous l10n report, and on the dev-l10n mailing list.

What’s new or coming up in mobile

This has been a rather quiet month in regards to mobile localization updates.

Teams are mostly heads-down working on kicking off the Fenix browser project.

In the meantime, other mobile apps are following their usual timelines and schedule –  so there is nothing much to call out this month.

Stay tuned for the next report, as we’ll have a few things in the pipeline to call out for sure!

What’s new or coming up in web projects Mozilla.org

We’ve added a new page ahead of the Firefox 66 release. Check in Pontoon and look for firefox/whatsnew_66.lang. To be part of the release, make sure to complete it by March 6. The demo URL is not ready at the moment. We will update you as soon as it becomes available.

A small but an important update is in the privacy/index.lang file. The change is urgent so please localize the string as soon as possible.

Have you taken a look of the newly designed navigation bar? It was recently rolled out with quite a bit of content to localize. Make it a high priority if it is not localized yet.

Common Voice

The team is super excited to launch the sentence collection tool! Though in Beta, it is fully functional. Moving forward, the site will be the place to submit, review and validate sentences in a more organized way and it is a lot easier for everyone, especially those who are not technical. Be sure to read the How To guide to make full use of the features. We want to thank all the key contributors who helped make the tool a reality.

Legal documents

Common Voice: The Privacy Notice and the Legal Terms have been updated in English. Only a select few languages are updated accordingly. These are the languages that have reached the threshold of collecting a minimum of 5000 sentences. If your community has  the bandwidth, feel free to review and make necessary suggestions. All these suggestions are subject to peer review before the corrections are published. These are the languages that are recently updated: Breton, Catalan, Chuvash, Dutch, Esperanto, German, French, Hakha Chin, Irish, Italian, Kabyle, Kyrgyz, Slovenian, Tatar, Traditional Chinese, Turkish, Welsh.

Firefox Lite: We’ve added Traditional Chinese and Vietnamese to the Privacy Notice. Feel free to review the document and make necessary changes.

What’s new or coming up in Foundation projects

The foundation’s impact goal — Better machine decision making — now has its public wiki page with a lot of resources explaining the Foundation’s goals and activities for 2019 and beyond. If you want to learn more about what MoFo is up to, this is a great way to dive in!

Fundraising

The fundraising team is starting to plan some mini-campaigns linked to specific events (the Internet Health Report publication, Fellowships, MozFest, and the traditional end-of-year fundraising) with the goal of explaining that Mozilla does much more than a browser and providing potential donors with a better understanding of the Foundation’s work.
We mentioned the new receipts in the previous L10N Report, those are still coming, they just needed further adjustments and another round of review from the Legal team. The team wants to get this right to have future-proof donation receipts.

Advocacy

The EU misinformation campaign has started! The survey mentioned last month went out, and on February 11th, the team sent an open letter to Facebook (simultaneously launched in English, French & German) asking for more transparency on political ads ahead of the EU elections. This letter was also signed by 38 partners including Access Now, Greenpeace and Reporters Without Borders.

Facebook responded in just a few hours, preventing us from publishing the open letter in more languages, but thanks to the dedication of localizers, the simultaneous launch in multiple languages has more than doubled the public engagement: while the team has sent more emails in English, engagement in the campaign in terms of clicks, open letter signatures and post-signing donations came primarily from localized emails in French and German! Mozilla has since responded to the announcement.

Next steps will be an opportunity to involve even more locales and will include launching a scorecard and an election bundle. Rooted in the principles outlined in the European Commission’s Code of Practice on Disinformation, the scorecard will compare how major social platforms are performing as they take steps to combat dis/misinformation.

What’s new or coming up in SuMo

There have been some important changes in Mozilla staff since the last report.

We need your help to review the following articles:

  • In all the locales for Firefox 65 articles:

Want to follow the Firefox 66 modified articles to be published in the SUMO Discourse in the coming weeks?  Please subscribe to the tag.

What’s new or coming up in Pontoon

At the end of last year we held a community design sprint with aim of improving the review process in Pontoon. The proposed changes were mostly focused around one of the top requested features of Pontoon – translation comments.

The following product specification is a result of the design sprint. It defines the problem we’re solving, lists measurable goals we’d like to achieve, outlines the proposed solution and provides a rough timeline.

It’s a short, 7 minute read. Please have a look at it, or at least skim through the screenshot tour. As you’ll see, changes to the translate view are pretty substantial, so we’d like to hear your opinion. Either on Discourse or in the spec.

Useful Links Questions? Want to get involved?

Did you enjoy reading this report? Let us know how we can improve by reaching out to any one of the l10n-drivers listed above.

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Mozilla VR Blog: Building an In-Game Editor

Mozilla planet - do, 21/02/2019 - 17:39
Building an In-Game Editor

This is part 4 of my series on how I built Jingle Smash, a block smashing WebVR game

Jingle Smash is a WebVR game where you shoot ornaments at blocks to knock them over. It has multiple levels, each which is custom designed with blocks to form the puzzle. Since you play in a first person perspective 3D, the levels must carefully designed for this unique view point. To make the design proess easier I created a simple in-game 3D editor.

While Jingle Smash is similar in concept to Angry Birds there is a big difference. The player sees the level head on from a 3D perspective instead of a side view. This means the player can’t see the whole level at once, requiring completely custom designed levels. Rovio is facing this challenge as well with their upcoming VR version of Angry Birds. The difficult part of editing a 3D game on a desktop is that you don’t really experience the levels the same way they will actually be played.

At first I went back and forth from 2D view to my VR headset every time I made a change to a level, even just sliding a few blocks around. As you can imagine this grew very tedious. The ideal tool would let me move objects around in the same mode where I play with them. I needed an in-game editor. So that’s what I built, and I created a minimal UI toolkit in the process.

Basic editing

Levels are stored as JSON files, loaded and saved from a server I had already created for another purpose. For moving objects around I used the TransformControls example code from ThreeJS. Doing transform controls right is hard, so I didn’t want to reinvent that wheel.

Building an In-Game Editor

In addition to moving blocks around I needed a way to create and delete them and set their properties like size, type, and weight. This called for a property sheet. The problem is when we go into immersive mode we no longer have access to the DOM. We can’t just reuse HTML buttons and labels like we would in a 2D editor.

One solution would be Dom2Texture, an API for rendering a chunk of the DOM to a texture, which we could then map into 3D space. Unfortunately that is disabled until we can find a way to address the security issues (though there are ways to hack around it). However, we do have HTML Canvas, which lets us draw anything we want in 2D then copy that bitmap to a texture in 3D space.

Building an In-Game Editor

To link the 2D Canvas and 3D ThreeJS APIs I created an adapter class called Panel2D. What you see below is an abbreviated copy of the class. For the full code you can read it on Github.

export default class Panel2D extends THREE.Object3D { this.canvas = document.createElement('canvas') this.canvas.width = 256 this.canvas.height = 512 this.canvasTexture = new THREE.CanvasTexture(this.canvas) this.mesh = new THREE.Mesh( new THREE.PlaneGeometry(1,2), new THREE.MeshBasicMaterial({color:'white',map:this.canvasTexture}) ) this.add(this.mesh) this.comps = []

The code above creates an HTML Canvas element, a ThreeJS CanvasTexture to turn the canvas into a texture, and then a PlaneGeometry mesh to draw the texture in 3D space. This class holds a reference to all components internally in the this.comps variable.

To draw the 2D components the code calls them recursively with a reference to the canvas drawing context, then updates the texture.

redraw() { const ctx = this.canvas.getContext('2d') // fill background width white ctx.fillStyle = 'white' ctx.fillRect(0,0,this.canvas.width,this.canvas.height) // draw each component this.comps.forEach(comp => comp.draw(ctx)) // update the texture this.canvasTexture.needsUpdate = true } Handling Input

In 3D we have pointer events which are fired whenever the user’s pointer moves around in 3D space at different angles. 2D UI toolkits really expect something like a mouse event measured in pixels. To bridge this gap we must convert from 3d coordinates to 2d coordinates on the canvas.

//inside constructor on(this.mesh,POINTER_CLICK,(e)=>{ const uv = e.intersection.uv const fpt = new THREE.Vector2(uv.x*256, 512-uv.y*512) const comp = this.findAt(fpt) if(comp) comp.fire(POINTER_CLICK) }) //method to recursively find components at mouse coords findAt(pt) { for(let i=0; i<this.comps.length; i++) { const comp = this.comps[i] const res = comp.findAt({x:pt.x-comp.x,y:pt.y-comp.y}) if(res) return res } return null }

The pointer events using my abstraction provide a reference to the intersection, which includes the UV value. The UV is from 0 to 1 in the vertical and horizontal directions across the texture. The above code multiplies the UV by size of the canvas (256x512px) and flips the y axis to get 2D canvas coords, then recursively finds which component is under the cursor using the findAt method. Each comp class implements findAt to return if the component matches the mouse cursor.

UI controls

With the infrastructure in place we can create some actual UI controls. This isn’t meant to be a full UI toolkit that can handle every possible use case. Instead I tried to build the simplest thing possible. A UI control is an object with get, set, draw, and findAt methods. That’s it. There’s no hierarchy or theming, though that could be added later in a fancier version. There is just enough in the base to make it work for a property sheet.

export default class Button2D { constructor() { this.type = 'button' this.text = 'foo' this.x = 0 this.y = 0 this.fsize = 20 this.w = this.text.length*this.fsize this.h = 20 } draw(ctx) { ctx.font = `${this.fsize}px sans-serif` const metrics = ctx.measureText(this.text) this.w = 5 + metrics.width + 5 this.h = 0 + this.fsize + 4 ctx.fillStyle = this.bg ctx.fillRect(this.x,this.y,this.w,this.h) ctx.fillStyle = 'black' ctx.fillText(this.text,this.x+3,this.y+this.fsize-2) ctx.strokeStyle = 'black' ctx.strokeRect(this.x,this.y,this.w,this.h) } findAt(pt) { if(pt.x < 0) return null if(pt.x > 0 + this.w) return null if(pt.y < 0) return null if(pt.y > 0 + this.h) return null return this } set(key,value) { this[key] = value this.fire('changed',{type:'changed',target:this}) return this } get(key) { return this[key] }

The code above is for a simple button that draws itself and can respond to click events. Note that HTML Canvas doesn’t have a way to tell you the height of some text, only the width (actually it does, but support isn’t universal yet), so I used font sizes in pixels.

The set method fires a changed event. The root component listens for these to know when to redraw and update the texture to the 3D scene.

From this base I created additional classes for labels and groups. A label is like a button but without any input. It’s findAt method always returns false. A group is a control that calls this.layout() before drawing its children. By overriding layout we can implement rows, grids, or any other layout we want. The example below creates a panel with a row layout.

const rowLayout = (panel)=>{ let x = 0 panel.comps.forEach((c)=>{ c.x=x c.y=0 x += c.w+panel.padding }) } const tabPanel = new Group2D() .set('x',0) .set('y',0) .set('w',250) .set('h',32) .set('layout',rowLayout) .set('padding',0) .set('border',0)

Building an In-Game Editor

You’ll notice that I didn’t create any text input controls. That is because VR headsets generally don’t have physical keyboards attached, so I would have to implement a software keyboard from scratch. That is a lot of work and, honestly, point and click keyboards in VR are no fun.

Alternatively could temporarily jump out of immersive mode to do traditional text entry then jump back in. However this would be jarring, and would still require a software keyboard on standalone alone devices like the Oculus Go. Since I could get away without text input for this project I decided to skip it.

Next Steps

While it wasn’t pretty, the in-game editor got the job done and let me built levels far faster than I could have by editing JSON as text. I’m really happy with how it came out.

The code for the UI controls is in the webxr-experiments/physics git repo. If there is some interest I can clean up the code and move it into a standalone library that just requires ThreeJS.

Now that you've learned a bit about how I made Jingle Smash, you might want to watch my new Youtube Series on How to make VR with the Web.

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Karl Dubost: 02 - They fixed it

Mozilla planet - do, 21/02/2019 - 08:30

So on January 7, 2019, I wrote the first edition of "They Fixed It!"

This is a new chapter. I'll try to move forward in a semi-regular basis.

Let's see what are the cool things which have been fixed since that last report and helps webcompat to be better on the Web.

Thanks to them!

Otsukare!

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Mozilla Future Releases Blog: Enhanced Tracking Protection Testing Update

Mozilla planet - wo, 20/02/2019 - 23:37

Over the past couple of months since we announced that we would broaden our approach to anti-tracking we’ve been experimenting and testing Enhanced Tracking Protection, a feature that blocks cookies and storage access from third-party trackers. Recently, we published a set of policies that define which tracking practices will be blocked in Firefox, and a new set of redesigned controls for the Content Blocking section where users can choose their desired level of privacy protection. As the next step in our path to enable Enhanced Tracking Protection by default, this week we launched a study to observe how enabling this functionality for a group of Firefox users in our Release Channel would impact the online experience.

As part of the study, selected users will receive an onboarding experience which explains how to disable Content Blocking functionality like Enhanced Tracking Protection on specific websites. The onboarding looks like this:

With Enhanced Tracking Protection, you just browse and Firefox helps to prevent you from being tracked from website to website. Most web pages will load just fine, and your privacy will be better protected.

If you do happen to discover a web page not functioning as expected, you can report the issue by clicking on the shield icon in the address bar. Under “Content Blocking”, click on the “Report a problem” link. Your feedback will help us make the Enhanced Tracking Protection experience better for everyone.

From the same menu, you can also click on the button that says “Turn off Blocking for This Site”. Firefox will reload the page with Enhanced Tracking Protection turned off.

If you haven’t been selected for the study, but you would like to test the feature ahead of our rollout to more users, you can do so with the following steps:

  1. Click the menu button .
  2. Click Content Blocking. This takes you to the Content Blocking section in your Firefox Preferences Privacy & Security panel.
  3. Under Content Blocking, click on the “Custom” option and check the “Cookies” checkbox, and make sure that “Third-party trackers” is selected in the drop-down menu:

What’s Next?
We will monitor the results of this experiment so as to ensure that we are able to turn on these default protections for users with few disruptions.

The post Enhanced Tracking Protection Testing Update appeared first on Future Releases.

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Hacks.Mozilla.Org: Web Design Survey Findings and Next Steps

Mozilla planet - wo, 20/02/2019 - 16:51

In November, I wrote about my team’s work on experimental new web design tools. We also ran a survey to rank the challenges of web design and development. A big thank you to everyone who participated in our open design process! We received over 900 responses in one month, and discovered major findings which continue to inform the Firefox DevTools’ 2019 roadmap.

The Methods

With guidance from Mozilla’s data scientists, I chose the MaxDiff method for the challenge-ranking portion of the survey. MaxDiff requires the survey taker to make trade-offs within subsets of the pool of options. This works well for ranking a large number of options, which would be too overwhelming for a regular card sort. It also produces a more accurate overall ranking by emphasizing relative differences in priority.

In practice, this produced 10 survey pages that each showed a set of 4 random options from a pool of 23 total web design challenges. Participants had to choose the “least“ and “most” impactful options in each set. The ranking was then determined by scores computed using the following formula:

# times rated best – # times rated worst
—————————————————
# times item appeared

The second portion of the survey focused on specific frustrations with browser developer tools. For this section we only offered 7 options, so we used a simple drag-and-drop card sort.

The Takeaways

Survey MaxDiff results

The highest-ranked issues by far were related to CSS layout debugging—learning the root cause of mysteries like unwanted scrollbars and unexpected size and position. Accordingly, my highest priority right now is digging deeper into CSS debugging issues with further research and experiments. (You can help by taking my brief new CSS Debugging follow-up survey! More info below.)

Unsurprisingly, cross-browser compatibility was also a top choice. We’re investigating ways to ease the pain of debugging browser differences, including auditing, hints, and a more robust responsive design tool.

Mid-ranked issues included Flexbox, Grid, and Accessibility. We plan to continue improving our Accessibility Panel; however, for now we’ll step back a bit from our successfully launched Flexbox and Grid tools. Letting them breathe and collecting more real-world feedback will allow us to swing back with fresh new ideas later.

Lowest-ranked issues included Lack of Visual/WYSIWYG Tools, Animations, WebGL, and SVG. The visual tools part was surprising—we’ve seen a lot of love for click-and-drag visual tools like the beautifully designed Visbug and Webflow. I suspect my old-school wording here—WYSIWYG (“what you see is what you get”)—brought to mind less-delightful experiences of the past. There are clearly ways to improve developers’ lives with modern tools in this space.

As for the browser issues card sort, we hear you loud and clear on the issue of “Moving CSS changes back to my editor.” We’re currently in the process of adding export options to our Changes panel, and would love your input on our designs! DOM breakpoints are also in the plans for this year.

You can view the full MaxDiff and card sort rankings in this report.

Follow-up Survey: CSS Layout Debugging

 Help us build better CSS Tools! Take the survey

Now we need your help again! The main takeaway from the first survey was that developers and designers of every experience level want to better understand CSS issues like unexpected scrollbars and sizing. We’ve started researching and prototyping potential tool ideas for investigating specific types of CSS bugs, but we need your feedback to guide our work.

Please take a moment with our quick single-page CSS Layout Debugging survey and help us rank the most time-consuming bugs. Your feedback will be immensely helpful in clarifying our plans in 2019 and beyond.

Thank you!

Victoria & the Firefox DevTools team

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Cameron Kaiser: TenFourFox FPR13b1 available (now with WebP and AppleScript)

Mozilla planet - wo, 20/02/2019 - 04:21
TenFourFox Feature Parity Release 13 beta 1 is now available (downloads, hashes, release notes). I took a different tack on this release because I still don't have good solutions for the missing JavaScript features currently affecting Citibank, Github and a few other sites, so I've chosen to push out some side projects I've been working on in order not to make this a wasted release. Those features are support for WebP images and support for AppleScript automation.

WebP images are an up-and-coming format based on the WebM VP8 codec, another way Google will consume the Web from the inside out, but they do have image size advantages and Firefox now supports them in Firefox 65. Google has two demonstration WebP galleries you can use to view some samples, and there are colour-managed examples in the Skia test suite. TenFourFox's WebP support currently can display lossy, lossless, transparent and colour-managed images, and will properly use any embedded colour profile. However, it is not currently AltiVec-accelerated (we do have some AltiVec VP8 code, so this should be possible at some point), and it does not yet support animated WebP images, which will appear blank. For this reason we don't pass an Accept: header indicating we accept WebP images like mainline Firefox and certain other browsers, though we will naturally try to display it if we get one. If you encounter issues related to WebP, you can try setting image.webp.enabled to false, but I'm planning to ship this support in FPR13 final, so it defaults to true.

The other support is for AppleScript. One of the few advantages of being at feature parity instead of source parity is that we can feel free to implement features mainline Firefox doesn't want or consider a current priority, and one long-standing request going back to the pre-Firefox days is AppleScript support. In fairness, this is hard to achieve in Firefox, and getting harder because of its cross-platform asynchronous nature. Many of the assumptions AppleScript makes about an application and its internal object model are routinely violated for performance reasons in Firefox, and Firefox is not primarily written in Objective-C, so there need to be bridges written to regular C++ and JavaScript, proxy objects designed, etc. Since there was never any agreement on how this internal plumbing should look, only some speculative work was ever completed, and Firefox to this day only supports the basic AppleScript suite and some limited automation through GUI scripting methods.

However, one thing that would certainly be handy for those non-daily drivers who might have a Power Mac sitting around doing nothing is to automate some tasks with it, like a kiosk or a display, or to assist with certain rote tasks. For that, AppleScript would certainly be the most painless way of doing so, so here is a first cut of AppleScript support for TenFourFox. Essentially I took that 8-year-old speculative patch, modified it to work with Firefox 45 and 10.4 (some of the dictionary actually comes from the dearly departed Camino, which had rich AppleScript support of its own), and greatly expanded its feature set to yield TenFourFox's AppleScript module. With FPR13 beta, open the AppleScript Script Editor.app, switch to the Event Log tab, and try this script (substitute your TenFourFox application name for TenFourFoxG5):

tell application "TenFourFoxG5"
  repeat with w in every browser window
    repeat with t in every tab of w
      repeat while (t is busy)
        delay 1
      end repeat
      get name of t
      get URL of t
    end repeat
  end repeat
end tell

This will iterate through every open browser window and every tab within that window, check an important synchronization property to make sure that the tab is not busy (being opened or being manipulated), and then report the name (title) and URL (location) of what's loaded in the Event Log. If you're an AppleScript jockey, you can well imagine what you can do with that information.

Tabs also have other useful properties, like plaintext and HTML to get the text or HTML contents respectively of a tab.

You might also want to create scripts for the Script menu (assuming you have that enabled) that act on text you have highlighted. TenFourFox can do that too:

tell application "TenFourFoxG5"
  repeat while (current tab of front browser window is busy)
    delay 1
  end repeat
  display dialog ("" & selected of current tab of front browser window)
end tell

If you put this script into the Script menu, then highlight some text and select this script. A dialogue box will appear with the text you have selected. (Similarly, paste it into the Script Editor and run it to see.)

You can also turn TenFourFox into an automated kiosk. Here's a script that opens a new window, makes it full screen, and then updates the display with what the New York state traffic cameras see on the Long Island Expressway every 15 seconds. It uses a second synchronization property called opening to determine when it's safe to manipulate the new window. (To stop it, Alt-Tab to the Script Editor, click Stop, then return to TenFourFox and close the fullscreen window with Cmd-W.)

tell application "TenFourFoxG5"
  activate
  make new browser window
  repeat while (opening)
    delay 1
  end repeat
  tell front browser window
    set fullscreen to true
    set URL to "https://511ny.org/map/Cctv/428834--20"
    repeat
      delay 15
      reload current tab
    end repeat
  end tell
end tell

TenFourFox can also be automated with GUI scripting as well, which can be used to manipulate the pulldown menus and even deliver clicks and keyboard events on web pages and the browser chrome. The complete dictionary, like any scriptable app, can be viewed from the Script Editor's Open Dictionary... option. Do note there are a few gotchas and a few things that don't work as expected, and you cannot currently control foxboxes with AppleScript even if they use FPR13; you can read all about the current state of AppleScript support and get many more examples of scripting on the TenFourFox Github AppleScript wiki entry. It's not a perfect mapping of Firefox/TenFourFox onto AppleScript, but it's much better than mainline Firefox which can barely be script-controlled at all. Please consider this support to be a work in progress and there may be more bugs and features yet to add(ress). Post your comments as usual.

Like I say, I'm still concerned over the deficiencies accumulating in the browser that I don't know what to do with and don't have an easy means to patch into the browser core. That said, keep in mind that even if we did try to get a port of 52 off the ground to address these problems -- the functionality of which wouldn't guaranteed and has several major changes which would badly compromise TenFourFox's platform base -- we'd just have different deficiencies once Fx60 becomes the typical minimum, so it only delays the inevitable, and the Rust requirement for 54+ makes any later wholesale port impossible. Nevertheless, in the meantime these new features, although admittedly incomplete, at least give some additional functionality to the browser, and that's not worth nothing.

FPR13 will go final with Firefox 66 on March 19.

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Mozilla Future Releases Blog: Keeping Add-Ons Safe for our Users

Mozilla planet - di, 19/02/2019 - 18:48

When I started at Mozilla in 2008, I landed my dream job, as the Director of Add-ons for Firefox. I believed then, as I do today, that one size doesn’t fit all with Firefox.

Fast forward to 2019
We’ve seen many changes in the tech landscape since we launched addons.mozilla.org (AMO) in 2005. A few add-ons have millions of users, while there are many add-ons that have smaller audiences with specific needs. One add-on I really like is AddToAny, which lets me share on social networks. It is similar to a feature we used to have in Firefox that we removed due to lack of use, and I’m sure the 5,000 Firefox users of AddToAny are happy to have it. Unfortunately, the same system that allows privacy and security extensions to work can also make people vulnerable to data mining and malicious activity. While our users love how they can make Firefox theirs, they also look to us to maintain their safety and privacy on the web.

Now more than ever, we need to deliver on the trust our users place in us and the expectations we place on our users to understand the choices they make with regards to the software they install. In many ways, we’ve mitigated risks by adopting WebExtensions as our means for extending Firefox, but as more and more functionality migrates to the cloud, policing this ecosystem through code review and policy is impractical.

Fulfilling our brand promise of security and privacy
We’ve been discussing ways to secure the extension ecosystem to better fulfill our brand promise of security and privacy for Firefox users. Finding the balance between openness and security is an extremely hard problem to solve, but we are going tackle it by making a few changes to the ecosystem now and through 2020. In the spirit of iterating towards a reasonable set of changes that are intended to reduce risk to Firefox users as well as reduce the burden placed on smaller add-on developers, we’re exploring the following:

  • Helping users discover through Mozilla properties a curated set of extensions that we believe are useful and valuable.
  • Investing in helping users better understand the risks extensions can present, and giving them the tools to assist in managing those risks.
  • Reducing the risk of showing potentially malicious extensions through our products and services. This requires an ecosystem-wide approach, and there are a number of unknowns to address in regards to discovery and publication platforms (including Firefox and addons.mozilla.org).

Stay tuned
As we explore the future of add-ons we will continue to make users’ security and privacy a priority. We will test and try different things, and work with the Firefox developer community to find a good place where we are confident that our users will be safe whenever they use Firefox.

The post Keeping Add-Ons Safe for our Users appeared first on Future Releases.

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

This Week In Rust: This Week in Rust 274

Mozilla planet - di, 19/02/2019 - 06:00

Hello and welcome to another issue of This Week in Rust! Rust is a systems language pursuing the trifecta: safety, concurrency, and speed. This is a weekly summary of its progress and community. Want something mentioned? Tweet us at @ThisWeekInRust or send us a pull request. Want to get involved? We love contributions.

This Week in Rust is openly developed on GitHub. If you find any errors in this week's issue, please submit a PR.

Updates from Rust Community News & Blog Posts Crate of the Week

This week's crate is num-format, a crate to format numbers to international standards. Thanks to Vikrant for the suggestion!

Submit your suggestions and votes for next week!

Call for Participation

Always wanted to contribute to open-source projects but didn't know where to start? Every week we highlight some tasks from the Rust community for you to pick and get started!

Some of these tasks may also have mentors available, visit the task page for more information.

If you are a Rust project owner and are looking for contributors, please submit tasks here.

Updates from Rust Core

247 pull requests were merged in the last week

Approved RFCs

Changes to Rust follow the Rust RFC (request for comments) process. These are the RFCs that were approved for implementation this week:

Final Comment Period

Every week the team announces the 'final comment period' for RFCs and key PRs which are reaching a decision. Express your opinions now.

RFCs Tracking Issues & PRs New RFCs

No new RFCs were proposed this week.

Upcoming Events Online Africa Europe North America

If you are running a Rust event please add it to the calendar to get it mentioned here. Please remember to add a link to the event too. Email the Rust Community Team for access.

Rust Jobs

Tweet us at @ThisWeekInRust to get your job offers listed here!

Quote of the Week

… the experience I had in 2019 was dramatically better than the first time I touched the language. After a month I’m feeling very comfortable, and looking forward to writing more.

Ryan Ragona, Learning Rust in 2019

Thanks to Jules Kerssemakers for the suggestion!

Please submit your quotes for next week!

This Week in Rust is edited by: nasa42, llogiq, and Flavsditz.

Discuss on r/rust.

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Paul McLanahan: Multi-Stage Dockerfiles and Python Virtualenvs

Mozilla planet - di, 19/02/2019 - 02:22

Using Docker’s multi-stage build feature and Python’s virtualenv tool, we can make smaller and more secure docker images for production.

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Mozilla Addons Blog: Extensions in Firefox 66

Mozilla planet - vr, 15/02/2019 - 23:04

Firefox 66 is currently in beta and, for extension developers, the changes to the WebExtensions API center primarily around improving performance, stability, and the development experience. A total of 30 issues were resolved in Firefox 66, including contributions from several volunteer community members.

Major Performance Improvements for Storage

I want to start by highlighting an important change that has a major, positive impact for Firefox users. Starting in release 66, extensions use IndexedDB as the backend for local storage instead of a JSON file. This results in a significant performance improvement for many extensions, while simultaneously reducing the amount of memory that Firefox uses.

This change is completely transparent to extension developers – you do not need to do anything to take advantage of this improvement.  When users upgrade to Firefox 66, the local storage JSON file is silently migrated to IndexedDB. All extensions using the storage.local() API immediately realize the benefits, especially if they store small changes to large structures, as is true for ad-blockers, the most common and popular type of extension used in Firefox.

The video below, using Adblock Plus as an example, shows the significant performance improvements that extension users could see.

Other Improvements

The remaining bug fixes and feature enhancements won’t be as noticeable as the change to local storage, but they nevertheless raise the overall quality of the WebExtensions API and make the development experience better.  Some of the highlights include:

Thank you to everyone who contributed to the Firefox 66 release, but a special thank you to our volunteer community contributors, including: tossj, Varun Dey, and Edward Wu.

The post Extensions in Firefox 66 appeared first on Mozilla Add-ons Blog.

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Mozilla VR Blog: Jingle Smash: Geometry and Textures

Mozilla planet - vr, 15/02/2019 - 17:19
 Geometry and Textures

This is part 3 of my series on how I built Jingle Smash, a block smashing WebVR game

I’m not a designer or artist. In previous demos and games I’ve used GLTFs, which are existing 3D models created by someone else that I downloaded into my game. However, for Jingle Smash I decided to use procedural generation, meaning I combined primitives in interesting ways using code. I also generated all of the textures with code. I don’t know how to draw pretty textures by hand in a painting tool, but 20 years of 2D coding means I can code up a texture pretty easily.

Jingle Smash has three sets of graphics: the blocks, the balls, and the background imagery. Each set uses its own graphics technique.

Block Textures

The blocks all use the same texture placed on every side, depending on the block type. For blocks that you can knock over I called these ‘presents’ and gave them red ribbon stripes over a white background. I drew this into an HTML Canvas with standard 2D canvas code, then turned it into a texture using the THREE.CanvasTexture class.

const canvas = document.createElement('canvas') canvas.width = 128 canvas.height = 128 const c = canvas.getContext('2d') //white background c.fillStyle = 'white' c.fillRect(0,0,canvas.width, canvas.height) //lower left for the sides c.save() c.translate(0,canvas.height/2) c.fillStyle = 'red' c.fillRect(canvas.width/8*1.5, 0, canvas.width/8, canvas.height/2) c.restore() //upper left for the bottom and top c.save() c.translate(0,0) c.fillStyle = 'red' c.fillRect(canvas.width/8*1.5, 0, canvas.width/8, canvas.height/2) c.fillStyle = 'red' c.fillRect(0,canvas.height/8*1.5, canvas.width/2, canvas.height/8) c.restore() c.fillStyle = 'black' const tex = new THREE.CanvasTexture(canvas) this.textures.present1 = tex this.materials[BLOCK_TYPES.BLOCK] = new THREE.MeshStandardMaterial({ color: 'white', metalness: 0.0, roughness: 1.0, map:this.textures.present1, })

Once the texture is made I can create a ThreeJS material with it. I tried to use PBR (physically based rendering) materials in this project. Since the presents are supposed to be made of paper I used a metalness of 0.0 and roughness of 1.0. All textures and materials are saved in global variables for reuse.

Here is the finished texture. The lower left part is used for the sides and the upper left for the top and bottom.

 Geometry and Textures

The other two box textures are similar, a square and cross for the crystal boxes and simple random noise for the walls.

 Geometry and Textures
 Geometry and Textures

Skinning the Box

By default a BoxGeometry will put the same texture on all six sides of the box. However, we want to use different portions of the texture above for different sides. This is controlled with the UV values of each face. Fortunately ThreeJS has a face abstraction to make this easy. You can loop over the faces and manipulate the UVs however you wish. I scaled and moved them around to capture just the parts of the texture I wanted.

geo.faceVertexUvs[0].forEach((f,i)=>{ if(i === 4 || i===5 || i===6 || i===7 ) { f.forEach(uv=>{ uv.x *= 0.5 //scale down uv.y *= 0.5 //scale down uv.y += 0.5 //move from lower left quadrant to upper left quadrant }) } else { //rest of the sides. scale it in f.forEach(uv=>{ uv.x *= 0.5 // scale down uv.y *= 0.5 // scale down }) } }) Striped Ornaments

There are two different balls you can shoot. A spherical ornament with a stem and an oblong textured one. For the textures I just generated stripes with canvas.

{ const canvas = document.createElement('canvas') canvas.width = 64 canvas.height = 16 const c = canvas.getContext('2d') c.fillStyle = 'black' c.fillRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height) c.fillStyle = 'red' c.fillRect(0, 0, 30, canvas.height) c.fillStyle = 'white' c.fillRect(30, 0, 4, canvas.height) c.fillStyle = 'green' c.fillRect(34, 0, 30, canvas.height) this.textures.ornament1 = new THREE.CanvasTexture(canvas) this.textures.ornament1.wrapS = THREE.RepeatWrapping this.textures.ornament1.repeat.set(8, 1) } { const canvas = document.createElement('canvas') canvas.width = 128 canvas.height = 128 const c = canvas.getContext('2d') c.fillStyle = 'black' c.fillRect(0,0,canvas.width, canvas.height) c.fillStyle = 'red' c.fillRect(0, 0, canvas.width, canvas.height/2) c.fillStyle = 'white' c.fillRect(0, canvas.height/2, canvas.width, canvas.height/2) const tex = new THREE.CanvasTexture(canvas) tex.wrapS = THREE.RepeatWrapping tex.wrapT = THREE.RepeatWrapping tex.repeat.set(6,6) this.textures.ornament2 = tex }

The code above produces these textures:

 Geometry and Textures
 Geometry and Textures

What makes the textures interesting is repeating them on the ornaments. ThreeJS makes this really easy by using the wrap and repeat values, as shown in the code above.

One of the ornaments is meant to have an oblong double turnip shape, so I used a LatheGeometry. With a lathe you define a curve and ThreeJS will rotate it to produce a 3D mesh. I created the curve with the equations x = Math.sin(I*0.195) * radius and y = i * radius /7.

let points = []; for (let I = 0; I <= 16; I++) { points.push(new THREE.Vector2(Math.sin(I * 0.195) * rad, I * rad / 7)); } var geometry = new THREE.LatheBufferGeometry(points); geometry.center() return new THREE.Mesh(geometry, new THREE.MeshStandardMaterial({ color: ‘white’, metalness: 0.3, roughness: 0.3, map: this.textures.ornament1, }))

 Geometry and Textures

For the other ornament I wanted a round ball with a stem on the end like a real Christmas tree ornament. To build this I combined a sphere and cylinder.

const geo = new THREE.Geometry() geo.merge(new THREE.SphereGeometry(rad,32)) const stem = new THREE.CylinderGeometry(rad/4,rad/4,0.5,8) stem.translate(0,rad/4,0) geo.merge(stem) return new THREE.Mesh(geo, new THREE.MeshStandardMaterial({ color: ‘white’, metalness: 0.3, roughness: 0.3, map: this.textures.ornament2, }))

 Geometry and Textures

Since I wanted the ornaments to appear shiny and plasticy, but a shiny as a chrome sphere, I used metalness and roughness values of 0.3 and 0.3.

Note that I had to center the oblong ornament with geometry.center(). Even though the ornaments have different shapes I represented them both as spheres on the physics side. If you roll the oblong one on the ground it may look strange seeing it perfectly like a ball, but it was good enough for this game. Game development is all about cutting the right corners.

Building a Background

It might not look like it if you are in a 3 degree of freedom (3dof) headset like the Oculus Go, but the background is not a static painting. The clouds in the sky are an image but everything else was created with real geometry.

 Geometry and Textures

The snow covered hills are actually full spheres placed mostly below the ground plane. The trees and candy are all simple cones. The underlying stripe texture I drew in Acorn, a desktop drawing app. Other than the clouds it is the only real texture I used in the game. I probably could have done the stripe in code as well but I was running out of time. In fact both the trees and candy mountains use the exact same texture, just with a different base color.

const tex = game.texture_loader.load(‘./textures/candycane.png’) tex.wrapS = THREE.RepeatWrapping tex.wrapT = THREE.RepeatWrapping tex.repeat.set(8,8) const background = new THREE.Group() const candyCones = new THREE.Geometry() candyCones.merge(new THREE.ConeGeometry(1,10,16,8).translate(-22,5,0)) candyCones.merge(new THREE.ConeGeometry(1,10,16,8).translate(22,5,0)) candyCones.merge(new THREE.ConeGeometry(1,10,16,8).translate(7,5,-30)) candyCones.merge(new THREE.ConeGeometry(1,10,16,8).translate(-13,5,-20)) background.add(new THREE.Mesh(candyCones,new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial({ color:’white’, map:tex,}))) const greenCones = new THREE.Geometry() greenCones.merge(new THREE.ConeGeometry(1,5,16,8).translate(-15,2,-5)) greenCones.merge(new THREE.ConeGeometry(1,5,16,8).translate(-8,2,-28)) greenCones.merge(new THREE.ConeGeometry(1,5,16,8).translate(-8.5,0,-25)) greenCones.merge(new THREE.ConeGeometry(1,5,16,8).translate(15,2,-5)) greenCones.merge(new THREE.ConeGeometry(1,5,16,8).translate(14,0,-3)) background.add(new THREE.Mesh(greenCones,new THREE.MeshLambertMaterial({color:’green’, map:tex,})))

 Geometry and Textures

All of them were positioned by hand in code. To make this work I had to constantly adjust code then reload the scene in VR. At first I would just preview in my desktop browser, but to really feel how the scene looks you have to view it in a real 3D headset. This is one of the magical parts about VR development with the web. Iteration is so fast.

Note that even though I have many different cones I merged them all into just two geometries so they can be drawn together. It’s far better to have two draw calls instead of 10 for a static background.

Next Steps

I'm pretty happy with how the textures turned out. By sticking to just a few core colors I was able to create with both consistency and variety. Furthermore, I was able to do it without any 3D modeling. Just some simple canvas code and a lot of iteration.

Next time I'll dive into the in-game level editor.

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Mozilla Security Blog: Why Does Mozilla Maintain Our Own Root Certificate Store?

Mozilla planet - do, 14/02/2019 - 21:24

Mozilla maintains a database containing a set of “root” certificates that we use as “trust anchors”. This database, commonly referred to as a “root store”, allows us to determine which Certificate Authorities (CAs) can issue SSL/TLS certificates that are trusted by Firefox, and email certificates that are trusted by Thunderbird. Properly maintaining a root store is a significant undertaking – it requires constant effort to evaluate new trust anchors, monitor existing ones, and react to incidents that threaten our users. Despite the effort involved, Mozilla is committed to maintaining our own root store because doing so is vital to the security of our products and the web in general. It gives us the ability to set policies, determine which CAs meet them, and to take action when a CA fails to do so.

A major advantage to controlling our own root store is that we can do so in a way that reflects our values. We manage our CA Certificate Program in the open, and by encouraging public participation we give individuals a voice in these trust decisions. Our root inclusion process is one example. We process lots of data and perform significant due diligence, then publish our findings and hold a public discussion before accepting each new root. Managing our own root store also allows us to have a public incident reporting process that emphasizes disclosure and learning from experts in the field. Our mailing list includes participants from many CAs, CA auditors, and other root store operators and is the most widely recognized forum for open, public discussion of policy issues.

The value delivered by our root program extends far beyond Mozilla. Everyone who relies on publicly-trusted certificates benefits from our work, regardless of their choice of browser. And because our root store, which is part of the NSS cryptographic library, is open source, it has become a de-facto standard for many Linux distributions and other products that need a root store but don’t have the resources to curate their own. Providing one root store that many different products can rely on, regardless of platform, reduces compatibility problems that would result from each product having a unique set of root certificates.

Finally, operating a root store allows Mozilla to lead and influence the entire web Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) ecosystem. We created the Common Certificate Authority Database (CCADB) to help us manage our own program, and have since opened it up to other root store operators, resulting in better information and less redundant work for all involved. With full membership in the CA/Browser Forum, we collaborate with other root store operators, CAs, and auditors to create standards that continue to increase the trustworthiness of CAs and the SSL/TLS certificates they issue. Our most recent effort was aimed at improving the standards for validating IP Addresses.

The primary alternative to running our own root store is to rely on the one that is built in to most operating systems (OSs). However, relying on our own root store allows us to provide a consistent experience across OS platforms because we can guarantee that the exact same set of trust anchors is available to Firefox. In addition, OS vendors often serve customers in government and industry in addition to their end users, putting them in a position to sometimes make root store decisions that Mozilla would not consider to be in the best interest of individuals.

Sometimes we experience problems that wouldn’t have occurred if Firefox relied on the OS root store. Companies often want to add their own private trust anchors to systems that they control, and it is easier for them if they can modify the OS root store and assume that all applications will rely on it. The same is true for products that intercept traffic on a computer. For example, many antivirus programs unfortunately include a web filtering feature that intercepts HTTPS requests by adding a special trust anchor to the OS root store. This will trigger security errors in Firefox unless the vendor supports Firefox by turning on the setting we provide to address these situations.

Principle 4 of the Mozilla Manifesto states that “Individuals’ security and privacy on the internet are fundamental and must not be treated as optional.” The costs of maintaining a CA Certificate Program and root store are significant, but there are fundamental benefits for our users and the larger internet community that undoubtedly make doing it ourselves the right choice for Mozilla.

The post Why Does Mozilla Maintain Our Own Root Certificate Store? appeared first on Mozilla Security Blog.

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Hacks.Mozilla.Org: Fearless Security: Thread Safety

Mozilla planet - do, 14/02/2019 - 16:48

In Part 2 of my three-part Fearless Security series, I’ll explore thread safety.

Today’s applications are multi-threaded—instead of sequentially completing tasks, a program uses threads to perform multiple tasks simultaneously. We all use concurrency and parallelism every day:

  • Web sites serve multiple simultaneous users.
  • User interfaces perform background work that doesn’t interrupt the user. (Imagine if your application froze each time you typed a character because it was spell-checking).
  • Multiple applications can run at the same time on a computer.

While this allows programs to do more faster, it comes with a set of synchronization problems, namely deadlocks and data races. From a security standpoint, why do we care about thread safety? Memory safety bugs and thread safety bugs have the same core problem: invalid resource use. Concurrency attacks can lead to similar consequences as memory attacks, including privilege escalation, arbitrary code execution (ACE), and bypassing security checks.

Concurrency bugs, like implementation bugs, are closely related to program correctness. While memory vulnerabilities are nearly always dangerous, implementation/logic bugs don’t always indicate a security concern, unless they occur in the part of the code that deals with ensuring security contracts are upheld (e.g. allowing a security check bypass). However, while security problems stemming from logic errors often occur near the error in sequential code, concurrency bugs often happen in different functions from their corresponding vulnerability, making them difficult to trace and resolve. Another complication is the overlap between mishandling memory and concurrency flaws, which we see in data races.

Programming languages have evolved different concurrency strategies to help developers manage both the performance and security challenges of multi-threaded applications.

Problems with concurrency

It’s a common axiom that parallel programming is hard—our brains are better at sequential reasoning. Concurrent code can have unexpected and unwanted interactions between threads, including deadlocks, race conditions, and data races.

A deadlock occurs when multiple threads are each waiting on the other to take some action in order to proceed, leading to the threads becoming permanently blocked. While this is undesirable behavior and could cause a denial of service attack, it wouldn’t cause vulnerabilities like ACE.

A race condition is a situation in which the timing or ordering of tasks can affect the correctness of a program, while a data race happens when multiple threads attempt to concurrently access the same location in memory and at least one of those accesses is a write. There’s a lot of overlap between data races and race conditions, but they can also occur independently. There are no benign data races.

Potential consequences of concurrency bugs:
  1. Deadlock
  2. Information loss: another thread overwrites information
  3. Integrity loss: information from multiple threads is interlaced
  4. Loss of liveness: performance problems resulting from uneven access to shared resources

The best-known type of concurrency attack is called a TOCTOU (time of check to time of use) attack, which is a race condition between checking a condition (like a security credential) and using the results. TOCTOU attacks are examples of integrity loss.

Deadlocks and loss of liveness are considered performance problems, not security issues, while information and integrity loss are both more likely to be security-related. This paper from Red Balloon Security examines some exploitable concurrency errors. One example is a pointer corruption that allows privilege escalation or remote execution—a function that loads a shared ELF (Executable and Linkable Format) library holds a semaphore correctly the first time it’s called, but the second time it doesn’t, enabling kernel memory corruption. This attack is an example of information loss.

The trickiest part of concurrent programming is testing and debugging—concurrency bugs have poor reproducibility. Event timings, operating system decisions, network traffic, etc. can all cause different behavior each time you run a program that has a concurrency bug.

When your entire program is bugs, the only solution is to delete everything

Heisenbugs

Not only can behavior change each time we run a concurrent program, but inserting print or debugging statements can also modify the behavior, causing heisenbugs (nondeterministic, hard to reproduce bugs that are common in concurrent programming) to mysteriously disappear. These operations are slow compared to others and change message interleaving and event timing accordingly.

Concurrent programming is hard. Predicting how concurrent code interacts with other concurrent code is difficult to do. When bugs appear, they’re difficult to find and fix. Instead of relying on programmers to worry about this, let’s look at ways to design programs and use languages to make it easier to write concurrent code.

First, we need to define what “threadsafe” means:

“A data type or static method is threadsafe if it behaves correctly when used from multiple threads, regardless of how those threads are executed, and without demanding additional coordination from the calling code.” MIT

How programming languages manage concurrency

In languages that don’t statically enforce thread safety, programmers must remain constantly vigilant when interacting with memory that can be shared with another thread and could change at any time. In sequential programming, we’re taught to avoid global variables in case another part of code has silently modified them. Like manual memory management, requiring programmers to safely mutate shared data is problematic.

Generally, programming languages are limited to two approaches for managing safe concurrency:

  1. Confining mutability or limiting sharing
  2. Manual thread safety (e.g. locks, semaphores)

Languages that limit threading either confine mutable variables to a single thread or require that all shared variables be immutable. Both approaches eliminate the core problem of data races—improperly mutating shared data—but this can be too limiting. To solve this, languages have introduced low-level synchronization primitives like mutexes. These can be used to build threadsafe data structures.

Python and the global interpreter lock

The reference implementation of Python, CPython, has a mutex called the Global Interpreter Lock (GIL), which only allows a single thread to access a Python object. Multi-threaded Python is notorious for being inefficient because of the time spent waiting to acquire the GIL. Instead, most parallel Python programs use multiprocessing, meaning each process has its own GIL.

Java and runtime exceptions

Java is designed to support concurrent programming via a shared-memory model. Each thread has its own execution path, but is able to access any object in the program—it’s up to the programmer to synchronize accesses between threads using Java built-in primitives.

While Java has the building blocks for creating thread-safe programs, thread safety is not guaranteed by the compiler (unlike memory safety). If an unsynchronized memory access occurs (aka a data race), then Java will raise a runtime exception—however, this still relies on programmers appropriately using concurrency primitives.

C++ and the programmer’s brain

While Python avoids data races by synchronizing everything with the GIL, and Java raises runtime exceptions if it detects a data race, C++ relies on programmers to manually synchronize memory accesses. Prior to C++11, the standard library did not include concurrency primitives.

Most programming languages provide programmers with the tools to write thread-safe code, and post hoc methods exist for detecting data races and race conditions; however, this does not result in any guarantees of thread safety or data race freedom.

How does Rust manage concurrency?

Rust takes a multi-pronged approach to eliminating data races, using ownership rules and type safety to guarantee data race freedom at compile time.

The first post of this series introduced ownership—one of the core concepts of Rust. Each variable has a unique owner and can either be moved or borrowed. If a different thread needs to modify a resource, then we can transfer ownership by moving the variable to the new thread.

Moving enforces exclusion, allowing multiple threads to write to the same memory, but never at the same time. Since an owner is confined to a single thread, what happens if another thread borrows a variable?

In Rust, you can have either one mutable borrow or as many immutable borrows as you want. You can never simultaneously have a mutable borrow and an immutable borrow (or multiple mutable borrows). When we talk about memory safety, this ensures that resources are freed properly, but when we talk about thread safety, it means that only one thread can ever modify a variable at a time. Furthermore, we know that no other threads will try to reference an out of date borrow—borrowing enforces either sharing or writing, but never both.

Ownership was designed to mitigate memory vulnerabilities. It turns out that it also prevents data races.

While many programming languages have methods to enforce memory safety (like reference counting and garbage collection), they usually rely on manual synchronization or prohibitions on concurrent sharing to prevent data races. Rust’s approach addresses both kinds of safety by attempting to solve the core problem of identifying valid resource use and enforcing that validity during compilation.

Either one mutable borrow or infinitely many immutable borrows

But wait! There’s more!

The ownership rules prevent multiple threads from writing to the same memory and disallow simultaneous sharing between threads and mutability, but this doesn’t necessarily provide thread-safe data structures. Every data structure in Rust is either thread-safe or it’s not. This is communicated to the compiler using the type system.

A well-typed program can’t go wrong. Robin Milner, 1978

In programming languages, type systems describe valid behaviors. In other words, a well-typed program is well-defined. As long as our types are expressive enough to capture our intended meaning, then a well-typed program will behave as intended.

Rust is a type safe language—the compiler verifies that all types are consistent. For example, the following code would not compile:

let mut x = "I am a string"; x = 6; error[E0308]: mismatched types --> src/main.rs:6:5 | 6 | x = 6; // | ^ expected &str, found integral variable | = note: expected type `&str` found type `{integer}`

All variables in Rust have a type—often, they’re implicit. We can also define new types and describe what capabilities a type has using the trait system. Traits provide an interface abstraction in Rust. Two important built-in traits are Send and Sync, which are exposed by default by the Rust compiler for every type in a Rust program:

  • Send indicates that a struct may safely be sent between threads (required for an ownership move)
  • Sync indicates that a struct may safely be shared between threads

This example is a simplified version of the standard library code that spawns threads:

fn spawn<Closure: Fn() + Send>(closure: Closure){ ... } let x = std::rc::Rc::new(6); spawn(|| { x; });

The spawn function takes a single argument, closure, and requires that closure has a type that implements the Send and Fn traits. When we try to spawn a thread and pass a closure value that makes use of the variable x, the compiler rejects the program for not fulfilling these requirements with the following error:

error[E0277]: `std::rc::Rc<i32>` cannot be sent between threads safely --> src/main.rs:8:1 | 8 | spawn(move || { x; }); | ^^^^^ `std::rc::Rc<i32>` cannot be sent between threads safely | = help: within `[closure@src/main.rs:8:7: 8:21 x:std::rc::Rc<i32>]`, the trait `std::marker::Send` is not implemented for `std::rc::Rc<i32>` = note: required because it appears within the type `[closure@src/main.rs:8:7: 8:21 x:std::rc::Rc<i32>]` note: required by `spawn`

The Send and Sync traits allow the Rust type system to reason about what data may be shared. By including this information in the type system, thread safety becomes type safety. Instead of relying on documentation, thread safety is part of the compiler’s law.

This allows programmers to be opinionated about what can be shared between threads, and the compiler will enforce those opinions.

While many programming languages provide tools for concurrent programming, preventing data races is a difficult problem. Requiring programmers to reason about complex instruction interleaving and interaction between threads leads to error prone code. While thread safety and memory safety violations share similar consequences, traditional memory safety mitigations like reference counting and garbage collection don’t prevent data races. In addition to statically guaranteeing memory safety, Rust’s ownership model prevents unsafe data modification and sharing across threads, while the type system propagates and enforces thread safety at compile time.
Pikachu finally discovers fearless concurrency with Rust

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

The Mozilla Blog: Firefox for iOS Amps Up Private Browsing and More

Mozilla planet - do, 14/02/2019 - 15:00

Today we’re rolling out updated features for iPhone and iPad users, including a new layout for menu and settings, persistent Private Browsing tabs and new organization options within the New Tabs feature. This round of updates is the result of requests we received straight from our users, and we’re taking your feedback to make this version of iOS work harder and smarter for you.

With this in mind, in the latest update of Firefox for iOS we overhauled both the Settings and Menu options to more closely mirror the desktop application. Now you can access bookmarks, history, Reading List and downloads in the “Library” menu item.

Private Browsing – Keep browsing like nobody’s watching

Private browsing tabs can now live across sessions, meaning, if you open a private browsing tab and then exit the app, Firefox will automatically launch in private browsing the next time you open the app. Keeping your private browsing preferences seamless is just another way we’re making it simple and easy to give you back control of the privacy of your online experience.

Private browsing tabs can now live across sessions

Organize your New Tabs (like a pro)

Today’s release also includes a few different options for New Tabs organization. You can now choose to have new tabs open with your bookmark list, in Firefox Home (with top sites and Pocket stories), with a list of recent history, a custom URL or in a blank page.

 

More options for New Tabs organization

We’re also making it easier to customize Firefox Home with top sites and Pocket content. All tabs can now be rearranged by dragging a tab into the tab bar or tab tray.

Customize Firefox Home with top sites and Pocket content

Whether it’s your personal data or how you organize your online experience, Firefox continues to bring more privacy and control to you.

To get the latest version of Firefox for iOS, visit the App Store.

 

The post Firefox for iOS Amps Up Private Browsing and More appeared first on The Mozilla Blog.

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Mozilla GFX: WebRender newsletter #40

Mozilla planet - do, 14/02/2019 - 12:00

WebRender is a GPU based 2D rendering engine for web written in Rust, currently powering Mozilla’s research web browser Servo and on its way to becoming Firefox‘s rendering engine.

Notable WebRender and Gecko changes
  • Kats made improvements to the continuous integration on Mac.
  • Kvark fixed a crash.
  • Kvark added a way to dump the state of the frame builder for debugging.
  • kvark made transform flattening operate at preserve-3d context boundaries.
  • kvark enabled non-screen-space rasterization of plane-splits.
  • kvark fixed seams between image tiles.
  • Glenn fixed a bug with border-style: double where the border widths are exactly 1 pixel.
  • Glenn made some improvements to pixel snapping.
  • Glenn added some debugging infrastructure for pixel snapping.
  • Glenn tidied up some code and added a few optimizations.
  • Nical fixed a rendering bug with shadows and blurs causing them to flicker in some cases.
  • Nical simplified the code that manages the lifetime of image and blob image handles on the content process.
  • Nical added a test.
  • Sotaro enabled mochitest-chrome with WebRender in the CI.
  • Sotaro improved scrolling smoothness when using direct composition.
  • Sotaro fixed a window creation failure when using WebRender with Wayland.
  • Emilio improved background-clip: text invalidation.
Blocker bugs countdown

Only 0 P2 bugs and 4 P3 bugs left (two of which have fixes up for review)!

Enabling WebRender in Firefox Nightly

The best place to report bugs related to WebRender in Firefox is the Graphics :: WebRender component in bugzilla.

Note that it is possible to log in with a github account.

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Thunderbird Blog: Thunderbird Active Daily Inquiries Surpass 10 Million!

Thunderbird - wo, 09/12/2015 - 00:49

We are pleased to report that Thunderbird usage, as reported though the standard Mozilla metric of Active Daily Inquiries (ADI), has surpassed 10 million users per day on Monday November 30 2015 for the first time ever.

Thunderbird Active Daily Inquiries graph, showing new record of 10,000,000

ADI is a raw measurement of active users, and is taken by counting the daily requests from Thunderbird users for updates to the plugin blocklist. This measure under-counts active users for a variety of reasons (such as firewalls, or users that do not use Thunderbird everyday). Based on more detailed studies with other applications, a typical multiplier applied to ADI to estimate total active users is 2.5. So the best estimate of current active users is 25,000,000.

Thunderbird Celebrates its 11 Birthday

Eleven years ago, on December 7 2004, Mozilla announced in a blog post the birth of Thunderbird. Happy Birthday, Thunderbird!

String-freeze for Thunderbird 45 on December 14

The Thunderbird development team is working hard on the next major release of Thunderbird, version 45, which is due for release in March of 2016. String freeze for new features is this weekend. Over 1000 code commits have been done to the main Thunderbird code repository in preparation for this release (in addition to the tens of thousands of commits to the Mozilla platform repository that Thunderbird uses as its base).

Mozilla Foundation as (Temporary) Thunderbird Home

Coincidentally on the same date as the new ADI record, in a post to a public Mozilla discussion forum, Mozilla Chairperson Mitchell Baker outlined some upcoming changes in the relationship of Mozilla to Thunderbird.

In the administrative part of that post, Mitchell announced that the Mozilla Foundation under Mark Surman has been working with Thunderbird to provide at least a temporary legal and financial home for the Thunderbird project (which we have been sorely lacking for several years). At the same time, a formal process will be undertaken to determine what is the best long-term home for Thunderbird, which might be Mozilla or might be some other entity.

Practically what this means is that in 2016, Thunderbird will finally be able to accept donations from users directed toward the update and maintenance of Thunderbird. In the long run, Thunderbird needs to rely on our users for support, and not expect to be subsidized by revenue from Firefox. We welcome this help from the Mozilla Foundation in moving toward our goal of developing independent sources of income for Thunderbird.

In the technical part of that post, Mitchell reiterated that Mozilla needs to be laser-focused on Firefox, and that the burden this places on Thunderbird (as well as the burden that Thunderbird places on Firefox) is leading to unacceptable outcomes for both projects. The most immediate need is for the Thunderbird release infrastructure to be independent of that used by Firefox, and Mozilla has offered to help. In the long-term, there will be additional technical separation between Firefox and Thunderbird as a continuation of a process that has been ongoing for the last three years.

 

Categorieën: Mozilla-nl planet

Pagina's